From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa? |
Date: | 2004-01-02 03:14:22 |
Message-ID: | 200401020314.i023EMn02907@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I think it might be possible to develop a localized patch for 7.4 that
> only affects linux-hppa and doesn't risk breaking anything else: copy
> the slock_t definition for hppa from hpux.h into linux.h and add the
> inline'd version of hppa tas() from CVS tip into s_lock.h. But I'm not
> particularly interested in working on it at two removes from where any
> testing could get done.
I think he also has to modify src/include/port/linux.h to support the HP
processor.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-02 03:32:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-01 22:20:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock support for linux-hppa? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-02 03:25:20 | Re: cache in plpgsql |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-01-02 02:50:46 | Re: cache in plpgsql |