From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PL/Java issues |
Date: | 2003-12-31 23:47:49 |
Message-ID: | 200312312347.hBVNloD00529@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> As an example, if a PL/Java trigger on the order header executes an SPI
> query on the order lines, a trigger on the order line (also in PL/Java)
> might now want to call a method on it's parent object (the order header
> that is waiting for the SPI result set). This should NOT result in
> another OH instance being created for the same logical OH.
>
> Probably it is not possible to map these things automatically while
> keeping the system flexible enough to be usefull. But is it feasable to
> require the programmer to provide glue code for every procedure that
> does all these things? How does Oracle attack this problem?
How do our other procedural languages handle this problem? Are none of
the OO or interface via OO?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-12-31 23:52:57 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-31 21:59:36 | Re: using stp for dbt2 + postgresql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2004-01-01 00:34:51 | Re: [HACKERS] PL/Java issues |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2003-12-31 23:40:29 | Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ? |