Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com>
Cc: "Keith C(dot) Perry" <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com>, "pgsql-general (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Date: 2003-12-29 22:30:50
Message-ID: 20031229223050.GA2629@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 17:16:55 -0500,
Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So what's the next step? Do we keep the docs as is with minor
> improvements as the backend gets upgraded from one version to the next,
> or do we really step up to the plate and make Postgresql accessible to
> many new users? Do we stay behind or move forward? Is where we are good
> enough now?

I don't aggree that splitting up the documentation into very small pages
is a good idea. Most of the other other suggestions you made seemed good.

I also think that using a local copie of the documentation needs to be doable
(though some features may be lost when using it this way).

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Satrapa 2003-12-29 22:32:52 Recommended Reading List (was Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?)
Previous Message Ericson Smith 2003-12-29 22:16:55 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Satrapa 2003-12-29 22:32:52 Recommended Reading List (was Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?)
Previous Message Manfred Spraul 2003-12-29 22:28:08 Re: update i386 spinlock for hyperthreading

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Satrapa 2003-12-29 22:32:52 Recommended Reading List (was Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?)
Previous Message Manfred Spraul 2003-12-29 22:28:08 Re: update i386 spinlock for hyperthreading