Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please

From: Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-general (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
Date: 2003-12-21 13:37:32
Message-ID: 20031221133732.A23409@bacon
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 20/12/2003 18:04 Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'm actually starting to write one of these for postgres, and apparently
> there is another one in the works, from Thomas Hallgren.
>
> There is at least one significant architectural issue here to deal with
>
> Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communicate via RPC,
> or some other mechanism? ie sockets, or ? The alternative is to
> instantiate a java vm for every connection, this could be onerous as
> there would be considerable overhead for each java vm.

I think anything other than a single jvm would be too much of a
performance hit.

> This will all go away as soon as java version 1.5 comes out but in the
> meantime, what does everyone think
>
> Comments are welcome.

On platforms built with GCC3.2+, GCJ might be an alternative.

--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sebastiano Cascione 2003-12-21 15:59:12 sql_num_rows on win32
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-12-21 13:24:17 Re: Firebird and PostgreSQL at the DB Corral.