| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replace all with * in pg_hba.conf |
| Date: | 2003-12-19 15:28:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20031219112726.C3016@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > The minimal disturbance change might be to teach the parser to
> > distinguish between a quoted 'all' and an unquoted 'all', and forget the
> > '*' idea.
>
> Probably we ought to go with that, on backwards-compatibility grounds.
why not do both, but deprecate the use of all in the docs? say with an
eventual goal of removing the use of all altogether in 2 releases?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-19 15:33:11 | distinguish between all and "all" in pg_hba.conf |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-19 15:19:30 | Re: How can I return a NULL value from a function? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-19 15:33:11 | distinguish between all and "all" in pg_hba.conf |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-19 14:23:48 | Re: [GENERAL] restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted |