From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Christopher Murtagh <christopher(dot)murtagh(at)mcgill(dot)ca>, postgres general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted |
Date: | 2003-12-18 17:38:18 |
Message-ID: | 200312181838.18894.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Uh, no, because you can say something like
> revoke all on language plperlu from public;
> and end up with non-null lanacl (because it instantiates the default
> assumption that the owner has all privileges).
OK, that needs to be disallowed.
> We could possibly hack the backend to avoid that, but I think pg_dump
> will need the special-case test anyway since it has to be able to
> cope with existing databases, wherein lanacl may be non-null.
So far we know of 1 such database. I'd like to see some more before we
bother about it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-18 17:49:49 | Re: restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-12-18 17:07:34 | Re: Function Returning SETOF Problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-18 17:47:41 | Re: ISO year. |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-18 17:28:20 | Re: replace all with * in pg_hba.conf |