| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: My SGML build fixed |
| Date: | 2003-12-18 16:54:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200312181754.54502.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses
> > the onlookers.
>
> If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem?
> I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself.
Bruce said he does it because postgresql.org is regularly broken. To
that I say, fix it. If he says he does it out of joy, then I don't
care.
However, maybe we should structure the developer website listing
differently, such as
Development version of the documentation
* Mirror 0
* Mirror 1
so onlookers see that they are two more or less identical versions of
the same service.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-18 16:57:35 | Re: My SGML build fixed |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-18 14:51:38 | Re: My SGML build fixed |