| From: | momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql-server/src/backend/optimizer/path costsize.c |
| Date: | 2003-12-18 03:46:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20031218034645.A8D88D1B443@svr1.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot
Module name: pgsql-server
Changes by: momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org 03/12/17 23:46:45
Modified files:
src/backend/optimizer/path: costsize.c
Log message:
Here is the definition of relation_byte_size() in optimizer/path/costsize.c:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/*
* relation_byte_size
* Estimate the storage space in bytes for a given number of tuples
* of a given width (size in bytes).
*/
static double
relation_byte_size(double tuples, int width)
{
return tuples * (MAXALIGN(width) + MAXALIGN(sizeof(HeapTupleData)));
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shouldn't this be HeapTupleHeaderData and not HeapTupleData ?
(Of course, from a costing perspective these shouldn't be very different but ...)
Sailesh Krishnamurthy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-18 03:59:10 | pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml func.sgml |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-12-18 03:35:57 | pgsql-server/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresq ... |