From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron St-Pierre <rstpierre(at)syscor(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Function Returning SETOF Problem |
Date: | 2003-12-18 01:35:48 |
Message-ID: | 20031217173430.H75165@megazone.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>On a daily basis I place a lot of data into the empty table dailyList,
> >>and from that data update certain fields in currentList. I thought that
> >>using a function would be a good way to do this(?). However I get the
> >>following error when I run updateCurrentData():
> >> ERROR: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set
> >> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "updatecurrentcata" line 6 at return next
> >>I've googled and tried variations on the function, but without success.
> >>Can anyone help?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This probably means that you're calling it like:
> > select updateCurrentData();
> >and you'll need to instead call it with the function in the FROM clause,
> >something like:
> > select * from updateCurrentData();
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> aha, that's part of it. I now get this error:
> ERROR: wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT
> Any ideas on this one?
That sounds like a mismatch between the record in rec and your declared
output type, but I couldn't say for sure without a complete example
including the table declarations really.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alice Bag | 2003-12-18 01:59:02 | Re: Firebird and PostgreSQL at the DB Corral. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-18 01:01:23 | Re: Function Returning SETOF Problem |