Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-17 01:05:48
Message-ID: 200312170105.hBH15m424434@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
> > parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
>
> That's what I said, that's what I meant.

Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not telling
me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find out where the
SGML build fails.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-17 01:06:49 Re: [PATCHES] Double Backslash example patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-17 00:12:29 Re: fork/exec patch