Re: PG 7.4 on Tru64 UNIX 4.0 + threads

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nikola Milutinovic <Nikola(dot)Milutinovic(at)ev(dot)co(dot)yu>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 7.4 on Tru64 UNIX 4.0 + threads
Date: 2003-12-16 01:32:41
Message-ID: 200312160132.hBG1Wfj20897@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Yes, please tell use if your changed fixed your threading problem on OSF.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nikola Milutinovic wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> Building 7.4 "as we speak". I've run into one minor building bug.
>
> HW: DEC AlphaStation 200
> OS: Digital UNIX 4.0D + SP9
> PG: 7.4 sources
>
> When I choose to build "with threading support", "configure" selects following
> from OSF1 template:
>
> THREAD_SUPPORT=yes
> NEED_REENTRANT_FUNCS=no # 4.0 2003-09-13
> THREAD_LIBS="-pthread"
>
> Well, this breaks to compile, since ${THREAD_LIBS} will be added as an option of
> "/usr/bin/ld", which doesn't like it on 4.0D. I would propose to change it to:
>
> THREAD_SUPPORT=yes
> NEED_REENTRANT_FUNCS=no # 4.0 2003-09-13
> THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-pthread"
> THREAD_LIBS="-lpthread"
>
> I'm building with the new flags and I'll see if it comes up, runs and survives
> the tests. If I'm successful, what is the proper channel for getting this update
> into the sources?
>
> Note: this is for 4.0 version, it might work flawlessly on Tru64 UNIX 5.x
>
> Nix.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-12-16 02:08:02 Re: Relational data model dead?
Previous Message Ausrack Webmaster 2003-12-16 01:25:13 FW: database failure..