Re: Planner question regarding functions

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planner question regarding functions
Date: 2003-12-08 15:38:20
Message-ID: 20031208153820.GB5971@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 21:33:48 +0800,
Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I suspect I know what the answer here is, but I thought I would ask
> anyway. How transparent are SQL language functions from the planner's
> perspective? For example if I create a table:

In 7.4 simple SQL functions are inlined and work a lot like macros.
I don't know if set returning functions are able to be inlined.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed Loehr 2003-12-08 15:47:55 Re: corruption diag/recovery, pg_dump crash
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-12-08 15:23:13 Re: corruption diag/recovery, pg_dump crash