Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-05 00:28:53
Message-ID: 20031205002853.GZ9190@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:21:46PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > 'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > D
>
> Can you adjust the patch so that it contains only the relevant parts
> and creates valid DocBook?

OK. How do I test this? After "make && make check" at the top level,
there is no html or pdf.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-12-05 00:39:06 Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Previous Message Alvar Freude 2003-12-04 22:41:38 Re: bytea, index and like operator again and detailed