| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com, "Scott Ribe" <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com> |
| Cc: | johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Transaction Question |
| Date: | 2003-12-04 08:23:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200312040823.35775.dev@archonet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 04 December 2003 07:57, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
>
> I'm amazed that nested transactions are still not yet supported. Postgres
> is a mature product (from my understanding), and I can see loads of
> messages asking about nested transaction support.
Loads of messages asking for many other features too ;-)
It will get done sooner or later - the more assistance people offer the core
the sooner it'll be.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2003-12-04 08:47:40 | Re: Transaction Question |
| Previous Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2003-12-04 07:57:55 | Re: Transaction Question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2003-12-04 08:47:40 | Re: Transaction Question |
| Previous Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2003-12-04 07:57:55 | Re: Transaction Question |