Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: gforge

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com>,Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gforge
Date: 2003-12-01 18:39:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

>     If GBorg stays it will need effort and participation from the
> community in order to make it into a better development platform. That
> is not something I can do by my self.

Well, the main reason to move toward GForge is that it is being actively 
maintained and improved by  an outside community of people, while you've been 
on your lonesome for some time.     Given the number of other projects for 
which we need more people, I personally don't see anyone having the time to 
put in the work GBorg needs to "catch up" any time soon.

So my personal questions for you are:  a) what do you, personally, think about 
Gforge's architecture, community, and future?  b) how does gforge stack up 
against Sourceforge in your opinion?  c) if we switch away from GBorg, will 
that be the end of your involvement in the community, or are there other 
things you want to work on?

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

  • Re: gforge at 2003-12-01 18:26:09 from Chris Ryan


  • Re: gforge at 2003-12-01 20:49:59 from Chris Ryan

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2003-12-01 19:23:27
Subject: Re: gforge
Previous:From: Chris RyanDate: 2003-12-01 18:26:09
Subject: Re: gforge

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group