Re: LAMP pgsql article

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LAMP pgsql article
Date: 2003-11-29 04:07:28
Message-ID: 200311290407.hAT47SJ01405@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > So what's it going to take to get O'Reilly to include PostgreSQL in
> > their definition of LAMP (e.g. in the banner graphic)?
> >
> A lot more interest and articles about PostgreSQL (I asked).

Did they mention what "more interest" meant?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-29 04:21:19 Re: LAMP pgsql article
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-29 04:04:36 Re: LAMP pgsql article