Re: 7.4 logging bug.

From: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 logging bug.
Date: 2003-11-21 17:25:51
Message-ID: 20031121172551.GA30971@ping.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:49:28AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> writes:
> > It's still logging the "recycled transation log file". Is that
> > send to stdout instead of stderr maybe?
>
> No, it all goes to stderr. But that output comes from a different
> subprocess. Not sure why that subprocess would still have working
> stderr if others don't ... any ideas anyone?

It seems quiting and starting psql "fixed" it. So I guess it's
the backend that had the problem. So it was a different
subprocess.

> Does cygwin have any equivalent of strace/ktrace? It'd be useful
> to see whether the write() calls are still being issued or not.

It has a strace, but when I use it I get a nice exception. I
never really got either strace or gdb to work properly under
cygwin when attachting to an existing process.

Kurt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Rogers 2003-11-21 17:51:07 Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-21 17:09:00 Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?