From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Release cycle length |
Date: | 2003-11-21 13:03:59 |
Message-ID: | 20031121130359.GE26392@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:38:50AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >Yeah, I think the main issue in all this is that for real production
> >sites, upgrading Postgres across major releases is *painful*. We have
> >to find a solution to that before it makes sense to speed up the
> >major-release cycle.
>
> Well, I think one of the simplest is to do a topological sort of objects
> in pg_dump (between object classes that need it), AND regression
> testing for pg_dump :)
One of the most complex would be to avoid the need of pg_dump for
upgrades ...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"I call it GNU/Linux. Except the GNU/ is silent." (Ben Reiter)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-21 14:14:14 | Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd? |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-11-21 11:45:24 | Re: logical column position |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-11-21 18:32:38 | Re: Release cycle length |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-21 12:10:16 | Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |