From: | Archeron <archeron(at)archeron(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror |
Date: | 2003-11-19 21:14:53 |
Message-ID: | 200311191314.53697.archeron@archeron.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On November 19, 2003 12:59, Robert Treat wrote:
> Well, I'm guilty of having made changes on the live server in the past,
> though I think I have always sent a note immediately afterword to you
> informing you of the change. One potential issue we have all had though
> is that when developing the site you need a copy of the database on hand
> in order to get things working. I've manually pulled these down for
> myself in the past, but would you see an issue with checking in a
> pg_dump of the www server to cvs, so others could recreate a copy of the
> site?
>
> Robert Treat
I was thinking the same thing myself after having to haywire php files
together just to get a (broken) page to display. A pg_dump does not even
have to be in cvs really, just copied to a location on the web, say when the
backup pg_dump happens on the server. (Which I assume happens?)
-Wade Klaver
--
Life is a tragedy for those who feel and a comedy for those who think.
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
X - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-19 21:32:08 | Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-19 21:10:04 | [Fwd: [pgsql-advocacy] Keeping 7.4 the top news item of the week] |