Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Slashdot

From: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>,josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slashdot
Date: 2003-11-19 02:47:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Is there anyway to find out who actually rejected your
message and why?  And why Chris' was subsequently accepted?
It seems really incomprehensible that our announcement
from you of all people was rejected in the first place.  
We should try to find that out before we mention the 
faux pas to other media.


On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:31:24PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >
> > >>Wow - I can't believe I was the first person to post about 7.4!
> > >
> > >
> > > You're the first person not to be rejected.  How did you do it?
> >
> > Maybe I did it first, and then you guys got rejected cos of duplication?
> >   Maybe cos I just kept it simple?
> As I mentioned to you, I did it last night, and it had the same text that
> is/was in yours *sigh*
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

In response to


  • Re: Slashdot at 2003-11-19 06:37:54 from Shridhar Daithankar

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2003-11-19 04:53:12
Subject: Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
Previous:From: Sailesh KrishnamurthyDate: 2003-11-19 02:32:24
Subject: Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group