| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno LEVEQUE <bruno(dot)leveque(at)net6d(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Aleksander Kmetec <aleksander(dot)kmetec(at)intera(dot)si>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Email signature |
| Date: | 2003-11-14 18:05:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20031114180557.GA4572@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 18:05:55 +0100,
Bruno LEVEQUE <bruno(dot)leveque(at)net6d(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry Joshua, but syst. eng. hate html e-mail too. (at least some of
> them;-))
>
> In fact I think there people who don't know there is the choice (only
> html for them. "There is another solution in oulook ?" ) and others.
One thing I have thought of doing is using multipart/alternative to
add a text/html part that didn't match the text/plain part and instead
had a message to please disable html to read this message message.
I figure that most geeks will have set their mailer to prefer text/plain
over text/html instead of going by part order for multipart/alternative
messages. I haven't wanted to spend the work to do this though.
I do run a couple of low volume mailing lists using ezmlm-idx and I
have html stripped out of messages so that pure html messages get
rejected and multipart/alternative messages only end up having
their text/plain parts get through.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robby Russell | 2003-11-14 18:42:30 | WIKI for techdocs/guides WAS Re: Comparing databases |
| Previous Message | Bruno LEVEQUE | 2003-11-14 17:05:55 | Re: Email signature |