| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system |
| Date: | 2003-11-13 15:03:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20031113150354.GG25144@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:43:03PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> <rant> People often like to say they need hot-fail-capable, five
BTW, this was not a rant at the person posting -- he was just
reporting what he has heard. I've heard it plenty, too, and the
people whence I've heard it are the rant targets. Since hot-failover
replication really is indistinguishable from magic in the eyes of the
correctly-shaped-hair crowd, they ask for it all over the place,
figuring it'll be free.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-13 15:06:34 | Re: Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-13 15:01:07 | Re: Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-13 15:06:34 | Re: Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-13 15:01:07 | Re: Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system |