Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system
Date: 2003-11-13 04:36:16
Message-ID: 200311130436.hAD4aGZ22292@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hans-Jrgen Schnig wrote:
> Meanwhile we seem to be in a situation where PostgreSQL is rather
> competing against Oracle than against MySQL. In our case there are more
> people asking for Oracle -> Pg migration than for MySQL -> Pg. MySQL
> does not seem to be the great enemy because most people know that it is
> an inferior product anyway.

I can confirm Hans' impressions --- I get very few questions about MySQL
vs. PostgreSQL, at least in the past few years. People still using
MySQL at this point know they are using something inferior to
PostgreSQL, and if they didn't, the new MySQL licensing has made it
abundantly clear. MySQL just isn't in the same league, and probably
will never be. What people want is Informix/Oracle/MS-SQL => PostgreSQL.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Murtagh 2003-11-13 04:42:56 Re: plpgsql return setof integer?
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2003-11-13 04:33:54 Re: RHEL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-11-13 04:44:38 Re: rpm support for 7.4 and beyond
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-13 04:29:15 Re: Successful proting report for 7.4beta4 on Irix and Altix