| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Karppinen <marko(at)karppinen(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: About the partial tarballs |
| Date: | 2003-11-11 22:48:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20031111184523.D56037@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Marko Karppinen wrote:
> I agree that the partial tarballs can confuse an ftp user, though. I
> think a good solution to this would be to put them one level deeper,
> into a subfolder. The full tarball would then be the only thing a casual
> user would encounter, but the source-based port systems could still
> benefit from the partial tarballs.
I don't agree, but if you can suggest improved working to:
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/README.dist-split
to reduce the confusion, that would be great. I've just symlink'd it into
the source directories as the .message, so that its displays when you
enter the directory ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-11-11 23:58:17 | Re: About the partial tarballs |
| Previous Message | Marko Karppinen | 2003-11-11 22:30:13 | Re: About the partial tarballs |