Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Automatic auditing suggestion

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Automatic auditing suggestion
Date: 2003-10-31 00:18:57
Message-ID: 20031031011857.B618@hermes.hilbert.loc (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
> I wouldn't limit it to 10 layers deep.  That should be all user configurable.  
> Some implementations would need full history audits, etc.
There's a few implementations to be found on gborg (?), using
C or plpgsql, respectively. Another one (which I wrote for
GnuMed) is in the GnuMed CVS below

Ask for details if interested.

> My skill with 
> triggers and plpgsql is not up to this task currently, but this is a 
> suggestion for the PostgreSQL developers.
I should hope the developers spend their time on less trivial
(as long as the auditing isn't mucking with the MVCC
properties, that is) tasks. A big thanks to them for making
PostgreSQL what it is.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Chris StokesDate: 2003-10-31 00:54:55
Subject: database speed
Previous:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2003-10-30 23:47:58
Subject: Re: Info Required!!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group