Re: Call for port reports

Nol Kthe wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Am Sa, den 25.10.2003 schrieb No?l K?the um 01:17:
> > > It is time for people to report their port testing. Please test against
> > > current CVS or beta5 and report your 'uname -a'.
> > >
> > > The current list is at:
> > >
> > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
> >
> > here are some build reports. Its all on Debian GNU/Linux with different
> > architectures:
>
> ======================
> All 93 tests passed.
> ======================
>
> rm regress.o
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/noel/pgsql/src/test/regress'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/noel/pgsql/src/test'
> noel(at)pergolesi:~/pgsql$ uname -a
> Linux pergolesi 2.4.22 #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 20:56:25 CEST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> It says i686 but its AMD Opteron:
>
> noel(at)pergolesi:~/pgsql$ cat /proc/cpuinfo |more
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family : 15
> model : 5
> model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 240
> stepping : 1
> cpu MHz : 1394.299
> cache size : 1024 KB
> ...

I am confused how to handle this. Is this running in 32-bit mode? I am
inclined to mention Opteron only when tested in 64-bit mode, because I
think we all assume a 32-bit Opteron is the same as a standard
AMD/Intel. Does uname report differently in 64-bit mode.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073