Re: Recomended FS

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Date: 2003-10-23 23:34:22
Message-ID: 200310232334.h9NNYMj04284@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Its worth checking - isn't it ?
>
> I appeciate that you may have performed such tests previously - but as
> hardware and software evolve its often worth repeating such tests (goes
> away to do the suggested one tonight).
>
> Note that I am not trying to argue away the issue about write caching -
> it *has* to increase the risk of database corruption following a power
> failure, however if your backups are regular and reliable this may be a
> risk worth taking to achieve acceptable performance at a low price.

Sure, but how many people are taking that risk and not knowing it!

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2003-10-24 00:13:17 Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
Previous Message Martin Marques 2003-10-23 23:17:35 Re: Desperate help needed for Replication