Re: Open Groupware

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open Groupware
Date: 2003-10-22 17:19:09
Message-ID: 20031022141746.H75070@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


IMHO, if a posting goes to announce, and is for an OSS project that
revolves around PostgreSQL (and isn't the fifth minor release that week),
I generally let her through ... its not a high traffic list right now as
it is ... if its a commercial project/software, then major releases is
about it ...

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Josh Berkus writes:
>
> > No, and we should ... they're good guys. You want to invite them to forward
> > their announcements to announce(at)postgresql(dot)org? Major releases only, of
> > course.
>
> What kind of measure to do want to apply to control who should forward
> announcements to our announcement list? I can name half a dozen other
> projects that support PostgreSQL no more no less than this package, but
> ISTM that people who want to find out about packages that work with
> PostgreSQL should go to our website (there is/used to be(?) a page that
> covers this), and people who want to track the project progress can
> subscribe to their announcement lists.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-10-22 17:19:51 Re: Open Groupware
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-22 16:43:16 Re: Open Groupware