Re: Last beta ... we hope?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Last beta ... we hope?
Date: 2003-10-22 16:10:21
Message-ID: 20031022131015.E75070@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 16:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > 'K, I packaged it up last night so that the ftp mirrors could get up to
> > date on it ... I'm going to put out an announce to -general and -announce
> > on this later this evening, but if someone wants to take a quick scan of
> > the tar ball to make sure that it all looks okay to them, that would be
> > great ...
>
> So, is an initdb from beta4 required or not?

Yes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-22 16:54:04 Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-22 16:08:23 Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message World Wide Web Owner 2003-10-23 07:55:58 New News Entry
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-10-22 16:08:14 Re: Last beta ... we hope?