From: Andrew Overholt <overholt(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Jee <djee(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject:
Date: 2003-10-22 13:02:20
Message-ID: 20031022130220.GA26133@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-ports

djee
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [GENERAL] Redhat RPMs
Reply-To: Andrew Overholt <overholt(at)redhat(dot)com>
In-Reply-To: <200310141315(dot)18492(dot)lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>

Lamar Owen once said:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 08:52 pm, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > Oops! nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk ("Nigel J. Andrews") was seen
> spray-painting on a wall:
> > > I've not looked at many RPMs but I must say that the few I have have
> > > never been relocatable. Can the postgresql RPMs not be made
> > > relocatable?

I tried this once but had many issues with initdb and a few others IIRC.
The locations of data directories and such was being hard-coded in them at
compile time and I had to do a lot of sed-ing in the specfile to make it
work. I know I accomplished that but ended up hitting a wall with
something ... I'll look in my old mail to remind myself what it was.

> It wasn't at that time implemented due to political factors (read: the then
> Red Hat maintainer (@redhat.com) refused to include such support even if I

I don't think that applies anymore :) David Jee is the current maintainer
and I'm sure that he'd be open to such suggestions. I've CC'd him.

Andrew

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pedro Alves 2003-10-22 13:05:57 Re: Same conditions, different planning?
Previous Message Peter Childs 2003-10-22 13:01:16 Trigger

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Overholt 2003-10-22 13:07:57 Re: [PORTS] Redhat RPMs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-18 03:06:20 Re: Macro errors on Panther (MacOSX 10.3)