Re: Unicode upper() bug still present

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: hannu(at)tm(dot)ee
Cc: zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Date: 2003-10-21 09:30:03
Message-ID: 20031021.183003.97297784.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tatsuo Ishii kirjutas T, 21.10.2003 kell 12:07:
> > > Why cannot do PostgreSQL as 100% pure Unicode system? We can do
> > > conversion from/to others encodings as client/server communication
> > > extension, but internaly in BE we can use only pure Unicode data. I
> > > think a lot of things will more simple...
> >
> > Please don't do that. There's a known issue of round trip conversion
> > between Unicode and other encodings
>
> Are these unsolvable even in theory ?

Right.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2003-10-21 10:58:39 Re: 2-phase commit
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2003-10-21 09:27:28 Re: Unicode upper() bug still present