Re: variable date precision

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: christoph(dot)dellavalle(at)goetheanum(dot)ch
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: variable date precision
Date: 2003-10-16 17:11:25
Message-ID: 20031016171125.GC28009@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:07:01 +0200,
christoph(dot)dellavalle(at)goetheanum(dot)ch wrote:
> hi there
>
> i've got a problem with a field set up as type date. now we discovered that we have to allow not only full dates (2003-10-16) but also dates where we have only a month or even a year. we see that it is not a very good practice to use the first of the month because it is ambiguous. on the other side, date does not allow entries like "2003-10-00".
>
> this db already contains quite a few records, so i'm not really keen on changing the data-type. nevertheless, i'm interested in the theoretically correct solution as much as in a practical one, since it is not the first time i've come across this problem.
>
> any suggestions are very welcome...

How are you going to use the incomplete dates?

When you say only a month do you mean that there is also no year specified?

One option is to pick an approximate day within a month and/or month within
a year. Another option is to use another column which indicates a precision
for the date.

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rickard 2003-10-16 17:15:47 Access Privileges
Previous Message Jeff Eckermann 2003-10-16 14:24:19 Re: MSAccess Problem