Re: Postgresql 7.3.4 compile failes on NetBSD 1.6 mac68k

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql 7.3.4 compile failes on NetBSD 1.6 mac68k
Date: 2003-10-08 19:26:08
Message-ID: 200310081926.h98JQ8j25146@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports


Would someone report on the answer to this m68k question?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com> writes:
> > Here is the patch to make postgresql compile on m68k 1.6.x NetBSD:
>
> I can't apply this as-is, since (I believe) adding the % marks would
> break the code for other m68k platforms. What we need is an #if test
> that determines whether % or no-% is the appropriate syntax for
> registers. Any ideas?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-08 19:33:44 Re: Separate shared_buffer management process
Previous Message pgsql-performance 2003-10-08 19:22:08 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 04:34:02 pgsql-server/src/template bsdi freebsd netbsd ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-06 20:35:36 Re: