Re: Architecture Roadmap?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James Rogers <jamesr(at)best(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Architecture Roadmap?
Date: 2003-10-06 22:55:13
Message-ID: 200310062255.h96MtDl20231@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

James Rogers wrote:
> While these should generate some performance improvements on smaller
> databases, more important to me is that it will go along way to making
> it scale more like Oracle when dealing with very large and active
> systems (my current problem). It has been a few years, but I've done
> implementations of most of these features in software before.
>
> So I guess I have two questions:
>
> 1) Does anyone object to me working on these two areas?

Sounds good. I assume you have read the developers FAQ. I would ask on
the list about each item to we can give you tips and get you in touch
with anyone else who knows about that topic.

> 2) What version target should I realistically be shooting for?

They would be all 7.5. We are only doing bug fixes now. There is no
limit to what can be added to a major release, if that is your concern.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-10-06 22:59:43 rserv and inet data type
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-06 22:52:44 Disabling function validation