| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 2-phase commit |
| Date: | 2003-09-29 14:45:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200309291445.h8TEjvB15221@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > is the "commit done" message needed ?
> > >
> > > Of course ... how else will the Slave commit? From my understanding, the
> > > concept is that the master sends a commit ready to the slave, but the OK
> > > back is that "OK, I'm ready to commit whenever you are", at which point
> > > the master does its commit and tells the slave to do its ...
> >
> > Or the slave could reject the request.
>
> Huh? The slave has that option?? In what circumstance?
I thought the slave could reject if someone local already had the row
locked.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-29 14:47:09 | Re: more i18n/l10n issues |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2003-09-29 14:41:11 | Re: 2-phase commit |