| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Date: | 2003-09-27 17:21:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20030927172145.GA2290@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:08:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > That is all besides the point. If adding -f to the command line is for
> > some reason prohibitive, then the same applies to -e. That is all.
>
> Seems we should recommend -f rather than "<" for restores anyway, right?
Please keep in mind that it is not always possible to use -f. In my
case I had a file larger than 2GB and psql was compiled without large
file support. Detecting an error in that situation would have required
recompiling psql.
Also I don't see the point in not extending the context message of the
error. It's not like it's going to take too much processing power, nor
screen estate, so what is it?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
It's worth the effort. Recommended." (Gerry Pourwelle)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:26:26 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Previous Message | Andre Truter | 2003-09-27 17:20:32 | Re: PostgreSQL Delphi |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:26:26 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-27 17:13:32 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:24:14 | Re: Statement.cancel() may cancel queries in the future |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-27 17:13:32 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |