| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "[ADMIN]" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test |
| Date: | 2003-09-26 20:50:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20030926134708.A32770@megazone.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Stephan Szabo writes:
>
> > It's not a problem for me unless I'm compiling with CFLAGS="-std=c89".
>
> Don't do that then. :-)
Well, the discussion started with Tom trying to find an option that
disallowed // comments for gcc. :)
> I don't agree with cluttering the compile line with -D_GNU_SOURCE just for
> the case when someone adds additional unsupported compiler flags. We
> might as well add -fhosted just in case someone tries to compile with
> -ffreestanding.
Fundamentally however, having configure run with a fundamentally different
compilation environment from an actual build (which _GNU_SOURCE basically
does) is dangerous. Even without -std=c89, can we say for sure that the
environment without it is exactly the same as with it?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 20:59:12 | Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 20:37:42 | Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test |