Re: Is there a reason _not_ to vacuum continuously?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Matt Clark" <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there a reason _not_ to vacuum continuously?
Date: 2003-09-17 22:17:26
Message-ID: 200309171517.26841.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Matt,

> I understand this needs an exclusive lock on the whole table, which is
> simply not possible more than once a month, if that... Workarounds/hack
> suggestions are more than welcome :-)

Would it be reasonable to use partial indexes on the table?

--
-Josh Berkus

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rhaoni Chiu Pereira 2003-09-17 22:17:47 How to force an Index ?
Previous Message Michael Adler 2003-09-17 20:46:00 Re: inferior SCSI performance