Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments
Date: 2003-09-15 21:42:59
Message-ID: 200309151442.59523.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Vivek,

> And the winner is... checkpoint_segments.
>
> Restore of a significanly big database (~19.8GB restored) shows nearly
> no time difference depending on sort_mem when checkpoint_segments is
> large. There are quite a number of tables and indexes. The restore
> was done from a pg_dump -Fc dump of one database.

Cool! Thank you for posting this.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-09-15 22:15:09 Re: Inconsistent performance
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-09-15 21:42:28 Re: Inconsistent performance