Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?
Date: 2003-09-15 06:16:31
Message-ID: 200309142316.31913.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom,

> That could be --- I don't recall exactly when we decided implicit
> bigint->int conversion was a bad idea ...

Well, it is a bad idea, so I won't argue. Sorry for the false alarm.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Jaeger 2003-09-15 14:22:51 Re: Foreign key constraint still active after table row removed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-15 05:59:54 Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?