Re: Vote: Adding flex/bison derived files in WIN32_DEV

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote: Adding flex/bison derived files in WIN32_DEV
Date: 2003-09-12 16:08:17
Message-ID: 200309121608.h8CG8Hu07950@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Because MinGW/Msys doesn't come with flex/bison by default, I have added
> >those derived files to the WIN32_DEV branch in CVS. It makes it easier
> >for people to install _just_ MinGW and compile PostgreSQL on Win32. The
> >branch will live for only 1-2 months until we start 7.5 development.
> >Those files will not be moved into the main branch.
> >
> >Should those files be in WIN32_DEV CVS, or should they be removed, and
> >require people to install bison/flex on MinGW. Even though they will
> >be updated infrequently, there is concern about CVS file bloat.
> >
> >
> >
> I vote for requiring MinGW+flex+bison. On *nix you need a similar
> combination, so why should MinGW be different? If installing flex and
> bison on MinGW is too hard you probably shouldn't be building out of
> CVS, ISTM.

OK, removed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 16:09:20 Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 15:45:04 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines