From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vote: Adding flex/bison derived files in WIN32_DEV |
Date: | 2003-09-12 16:08:17 |
Message-ID: | 200309121608.h8CG8Hu07950@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Because MinGW/Msys doesn't come with flex/bison by default, I have added
> >those derived files to the WIN32_DEV branch in CVS. It makes it easier
> >for people to install _just_ MinGW and compile PostgreSQL on Win32. The
> >branch will live for only 1-2 months until we start 7.5 development.
> >Those files will not be moved into the main branch.
> >
> >Should those files be in WIN32_DEV CVS, or should they be removed, and
> >require people to install bison/flex on MinGW. Even though they will
> >be updated infrequently, there is concern about CVS file bloat.
> >
> >
> >
> I vote for requiring MinGW+flex+bison. On *nix you need a similar
> combination, so why should MinGW be different? If installing flex and
> bison on MinGW is too hard you probably shouldn't be building out of
> CVS, ISTM.
OK, removed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-12 16:09:20 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-12 15:45:04 | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |