Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 03:14:34
Message-ID: 200309120314.h8C3EYS24952@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it ****BREAKS**** UnixWare (If y'all=
> > =20
> > care).
>
> Unfixably? Or just a small oversight?
>
> I'm actually not worried about platforms that are actively being tested.
> It's the stuff that hasn't been confirmed recently that is going to be
> at risk.

I sent him a new patch just now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-12 03:19:37 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-12 03:13:54 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 03:17:13 Re: Regression test for stats collector
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-12 03:13:54 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines