Re: FreeBSD/i386 thread test

From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD/i386 thread test
Date: 2003-09-08 21:55:11
Message-ID: 20030908215511.GI88340@nexus.ninth-circle.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-On [20030908 23:52], Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
>Why would FreeBSD have a "library of thread-safe libc functions" (libc_r)
>if the functions weren't thread-safe? I think the test is faulty.

Having libc_r is not a guarantee that all functions of libc are
represented in that library as thread-safe functions.

gethostbyname_r() is a notable reentrant function which is absent in
FreeBSD.

--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9DB7 9D88 97E6 839B 2EAC 625B
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/~asmodai/diary/
Character is what you are in the dark...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-08 21:58:09 Re: ISO 8601 'Time Intervals' of the 'format with time-unit
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-08 21:53:12 Re: FreeBSD/i386 thread test