Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Vasilis Ventirozos <vendi(at)cosmoline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ?
Date: 2003-09-08 13:15:50
Message-ID: 20030908131550.GC14906@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:32:51 +0300,
Vasilis Ventirozos <vendi(at)cosmoline(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all, i work in a telco and i have huge ammount of data, (50 million)
> but i see a lack of performance at huge tables with postgres,
> are 50 million rows the "limit" of postgres ? (with a good performance)
> i am waiting for 2004 2 billion records so i have to do something.
> Does anyone have a huge database to ask him some issues ?
>
> my hardware is good ,my indexes are good plz dont answer me something like use
> vacuum :)

Well if you want specific answers, you need to give us some specific data.
For example, explain anaylze output for the slow queries and relevant
table definitions.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-09-08 13:21:08 Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ?
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-09-08 13:13:19 Re: Performance Issues