Re: searching archives should be a weeeee bit faster ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: searching archives should be a weeeee bit faster ...
Date: 2003-09-04 23:26:07
Message-ID: 20030904202442.B51587@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


yes it is/was ...I've just removed it from the list of stop words, but am
not going to force a re-index of 250k URLs ;( So, any new index'ng will
pull in index as a valid search word, and when the current URLs
expire/re-index,they will get pulled in then also ...

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:

> Is "index" a stop word in the archives? It doesn't seem to return any
> results when typing in "index" with anything (ex: index correlation).
> FWIW, just a data point. -sc
>
> --
> Sean Chittenden
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-09-04 23:34:52 Re: searching archives should be a weeeee bit faster ...
Previous Message Nico King 2003-09-04 23:24:06 Question about Scripting in Postgresql.