Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Tommi Mäkitalo <t(dot)maekitalo(at)epgmbh(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Date: 2003-09-04 18:34:59
Message-ID: 200309041834.h84IYxR07020@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> To what purpose? I think I prefer Andrew Dunstan's approach of allowing
> >> IPv4 syntax in pg_hba.conf to match appropriate IPv6 connections.
>
> > I am confused. Andrew Dunstan's approach added a new 'loopback' line
> > to pg_hba.conf.
> > Andreas Pflug had the patch that treated IPv4 as IPv6.
>
> Ah, my mistake. The patch from Andreas seems like a reasonable thing to
> me.
>
> I'm of two minds about 'loopback' --- it's perhaps logically cleaner
> than referring to 127.0.0.1, but do we want another special case?
> Also, do we really need it if we add Andreas' patch?

I agree we don't need yet another pg_hba.conf keyword, and Andreas'
patch handles all IPv4 addresses, not just localhost.

Let me load up the patch queue today so everyone can see where we are
going.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-04 18:35:12 Re: PG7.5
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-04 18:25:33 Re: Win32 native port