Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: matt <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>
Cc: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load
Date: 2003-08-30 02:44:04
Message-ID: 200308300244.h7U2i4S12751@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

matt wrote:
> > Are you *sure* about that???? 3K updates/inserts per second xlates
> > to 10,800,000 per hour. That, my friend, is a WHOLE HECK OF A LOT!
>
> Yup, I know!

Just a data point, but on my Dual Xeon 2.4Gig machine with a 10k SCSI
drive I can do 4k inserts/second if I turn fsync off. If you have a
battery-backed controller, you should be able to do the same. (You will
not need to turn fsync off --- fsync will just be fast because of the
disk drive RAM).

Am I missing something?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-30 02:58:50 Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...
Previous Message John Battles 2003-08-30 01:40:09 pgadmin3-0.9.1 wxwindows build woes utils/misc.cpp:389: error: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-08-30 02:55:03 Re: bad estimates
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-30 02:34:34 Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance tests