Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:

>
>
> --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:19:49 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
> >
> >> So be it, but I was under the impression that the fix would be committed
> >> shortly after I posted it on LAST SATURDAY, but apparently Bruce was out
> >> of town, and the Beta2 TAG was laid, WITHOUT PUBLIC NOTICE about the TAG
> >> coming.
> >
> > Beta2 TAG was laid so that we could wrap up all fixes to date, of which
> > yours for unixware hadn't been included yet ... it had been 3 weeks since
> > Beta1, there were alot of changes, and if ppl are testing based on the tar
> > ball and not straight CVS, chances are most bugs reported had already been
> > fixed ...
> >
> >> Then the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits are thrown in my face for complaining
> >> about these facts.
> >
> > This was uncalled for, but so were your comments over one patch ...
> >
> >> I want to see PostgreSQL succeed and take over the Open Source DataBase
> >> world, and want to help, but y'all are making it HARD.
> >
> > Because one patch wasn't committed before we tar'd up a new beta?
> no, because the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits keep getting thrown in my face
> everytime I ask for UnixWare specific changes.

'K, since flamewars are just sooooo counter-productive to the task at
hand, can we just drop this and move on?

Larry, can you go to archives and let us know which URL contains the patch
that seems to be 'in question'? And post it in a seperate thread, so that
it doesn't get lost in this whole degraded thread?