Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete "Why Postgres

From: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete "Why Postgres
Date: 2003-08-23 02:48:55
Message-ID: 200308222248.55201.lowen@pari.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Friday 22 August 2003 18:42, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bad link. This gives me a post by Lamar Owen talking about usng OIDs to
> name files.

I think he may be referring to the last paragraph. Vadim had said that the
tablenames would go to OIDs. They have always been individual files. Been a
long time since I wrote that e-mail....
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-23 10:33:35 Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete 'Why Postgres
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-08-22 22:42:19 Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete "Why Postgres

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lincoln Yeoh 2003-08-23 05:53:25 Re: The ..... worm
Previous Message Paul Thomas 2003-08-22 23:55:38 Re: The ..... worm

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Creager 2003-08-23 04:17:17 Header files installed for contrib modules?
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2003-08-23 02:23:57 strerror_r and gethostbyname_r?