Please don't reply to messages to start a new thread.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:09:23 -0400,
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> wrote:
> I have a query which definitely runs faster when sequential scans are
> turned off. Which parameters do I tune? and which way?
>
> After quickly perusing the docs, and google, I think it is the
> random_page_cost?
Have you run vacuum analyze?
Can you supply a copy of the query and explain analyze output?